Topic summary
75% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hurricanes results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 3,103 hits . Analysis detected 18,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,017 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (11,471 of 16,251 topics). This Hurricanes is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Hurricanes
Topic details
Total words: 20,017
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst