Topic summary
7%9 analyzed articles/videos2,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humans results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 1,529 hits. Analysis detected 12,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,081 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,256 of 16,562 topics). This Humans is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate