Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nancy Shute results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 116 hits . Analysis detected 689 faulty-reasoning hits from 735 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,365 authors). This Nancy Shute is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Nancy Shute
Author details
Total words: 735
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles735 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.8% 15.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst