Topic summary
55%8 analyzed articles/videos3,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These How To results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 3,508 hits. Analysis detected 17,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,542 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,517 of 15,854 topics). This How To is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
How To
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 20.0%20.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate