Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christine Persaud results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Halo Effect , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Christine Persaud is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Christine Persaud
Author details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.7% 16.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst