Topic summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Home Secretary results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,389 hits . Analysis detected 8,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,541 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,239 of 15,765 topics). This Home Secretary is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Home Secretary
Topic details
Total words: 5,541
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst