Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hit-And-Run results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,101 hits . Analysis detected 6,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,464 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,008 of 16,562 topics). This Hit-And-Run is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Hit-And-Run
Topic details
Total words: 7,464
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst