Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jaimie Ding results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,210 authors). This Jaimie Ding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jaimie Ding
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Jaimie Ding (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,044
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–5%
0.0%1%2%3%4%5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%1%1%2%2%3%3%4%4%5%5%Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Recency BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos