Topic summary
82%7 analyzed articles/videos6,574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Historical Interpretation results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 4,320 hits. Analysis detected 34,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,925 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,631 of 15,781 topics). This Historical Interpretation is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Historical Interpretation

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate