Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamara Lewit results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 207 hits . Analysis detected 2,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,947 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,311 of 6,382 authors). This Tamara Lewit is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Tamara Lewit
Author details
Total words: 1,947
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst