Topic summary
20% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hip-Hop results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 532 hits . Analysis detected 3,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,127 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (6,773 of 15,534 topics). This Hip-Hop is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Hip-Hop
Topic details
Total words: 4,127
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst