Topic summary
⁠55%3 analyzed articles/videos1,573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Funding results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,237 hits. Analysis detected 10,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,967 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,421 of 16,559 topics). This Grant Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Grant Funding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,967
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos