Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Subsidies results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 775 hits. Analysis detected 5,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,624 of 16,562 topics). This Government Subsidies is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Government Subsidies
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠73%Government Subsidies (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,092
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.1%25.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 17.7%17.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos