Topic summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos1,766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Shutdown Impact results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 5,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,700 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,383 of 16,562 topics). This Government Shutdown Impact is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Government Shutdown Impact

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos