Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Peltz results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 2,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,658 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,815 of 6,628 authors). This Jennifer Peltz is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Jennifer Peltz
Author details
Total words: 4,658
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst