Topic summary
⁠71%4 analyzed articles/videos2,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Intervention results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,259 hits. Analysis detected 10,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,168 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,769 of 16,551 topics). This Government Intervention is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Government Intervention
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos