Author summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vance Ginn results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (1,705 of 6,495 authors). This Vance Ginn is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Vance Ginn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠74%Vance Ginn (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 21.0%21.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.3%17.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos