Topic summary
45% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Initiatives results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,703 hits . Analysis detected 16,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,086 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (13,059 of 16,562 topics). This Government Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Government Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 19,086
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst