Author summary
62% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley McBride results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,562 hits . Analysis detected 12,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,312 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,220 of 6,244 authors). This Ashley McBride is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Ashley McBride
Author details
Total words: 15,312
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst