At Next Step in West Oakland, adults catch up on earning high school diplomas 67%

By Ashley McBride62%

7/20/2026, 10:17:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 642 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,234 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the article peer group.

In a modest Victorian on a corner lot in West Oakland, a school tucked in a residential neighborhood is quietly changing lives. 
Inside Next Step Learning Center, the classrooms are abuzz with tutors and students studying from note cards and work packets. 
One pair is dissecting sentence structure, while at another table, exponents get demystified. 
But this is not a traditional school  the students are all adults, and the teachers are mostly volunteers. 
For more than 30 years, Next Step Learning Center has helped hundreds of adults in West Oakland and beyond earn high school diplomas, GED certificates, workforce certifications, and other life skills. 
This year, 121 people earned a high school diploma or GED, which will open doors for them to higher education and better jobs. 
It’s the school’s largest graduating class yet. 
Students come from all walks of life, with many having overcome homelessness, addictions, incarceration, domestic violence, and other personal traumas. 
Students come in a few times a week for sessions and are matched with either a volunteer tutor or a certified teacher. 
Once they’ve earned a high school diploma or GED, students can work with the college transition coordinator to enroll in college. 
There are no big group classes at Next Step; all students work one-on-one with Peggy Presley, the programs director, to determine the credits they need and plot out their plan to get there. 
Next Step Learning Center partners with Opportunity Academy, an Alameda County school with multiple locations in the East Bay, to confer the diplomas. 
But more than a certificate or a diploma, the school helps build students’ confidence in themselves. 
Rob Palmer has volunteered as a math and science tutor at Next Step Learning Center for four years. 
One of the most rewarding aspects of the work for him is seeing his students make progress and master something they had struggled with. 
“Helping somebody discover that knowledge and skills that maybe they weren’t confident that they had, and learn that new thing, is a good feeling,” Palmer told The Oaklandside. 
“A lot of the education is not about the specific content; it’s about self-confidence.” 
A graduation ceremony that “is indeed a big deal” 
On a bright and sunny July afternoon, graduates and their families packed the parking lot of Sacred Heart Catholic Church for the celebration. 
Claudio Bernardino enrolled at Next Step Learning Center this year after being released from prison in December, after serving 20 years for a wrongful conviction, Bernardino said. 
His dream before prison was to become an engineer. 
When he was released, his first goal was to get a high school diploma. 
“It is a sad reality that we live in a country where it’s easier to pick up a gun than it is to get an education,” Bernardino said to the crowd. 
“To my fellow students, be proud of how far you have come. 
There will be moments ahead that will test your confidence, but remember that you have already overcome obstacles you once thought impossible.” 
As Bandabaila addressed the crowd as one of the student speakers, she called her daughter up to the stage to hold a photo of another son, Jonathan Bandabaila. 
Jonathan went missing in Oakland seven years ago at age 19. 
She spoke about the sacrifices she and all her peers had made to get to this moment. 
“Some people may say we are just getting our high school diplomas and it’s not a big deal,” she said. 
“I am here to tell you that indeed it is a big deal. 
Do not let anyone diminish your accomplishments. 
We have done a wonderful thing for ourselves: We have laid a path for our future that we should be proud of, and no one can take that away from us.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.4%Ashley McBride: 4.4%Berkeleyside: 2.1%Confirmation Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 2.5%Berkeleyside: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Ashley McBride: 3.0%Berkeleyside: 2.3%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 3.1%Ashley McBride: 1.2%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.2%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 1.2%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Ashley McBride: 3.9%Berkeleyside: 3.2%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.7%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.6%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.3%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Ashley McBride: 8.3%Berkeleyside: 3.4%Optimism Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%Ashley McBride: 4.6%Berkeleyside: 3.8%Negativity Bias16.5%This article: 3.7%Ashley McBride: 2.3%Berkeleyside: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 5.8%Ashley McBride: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error5.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Ashley McBride: 1.3%Berkeleyside: 0.9%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Ashley McBride: 3.1%Berkeleyside: 3.6%Halo Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Ashley McBride: 0.6%Berkeleyside: 0.8%Recency Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.1%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.1%Ashley McBride: 0.3%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Straw Man3.1%This article: 8.4%Ashley McBride: 3.2%Berkeleyside: 3.2%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 4.8%Ashley McBride: 1.5%Berkeleyside: 0.7%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.8%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 2.6%Berkeleyside: 2.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.9%Ashley McBride: 0.1%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Bandwagon1.9%This article: 20.1%Ashley McBride: 10.2%Berkeleyside: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion20.1%This article: 2.0%Ashley McBride: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Begging the Question2.0%This article: 5.8%Ashley McBride: 4.0%Berkeleyside: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.2%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.6%Ashley McBride: 0.1%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Composition/Division2.6%This article: 5.9%Ashley McBride: 6.0%Berkeleyside: 3.0%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 4.0%Berkeleyside: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.3%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Ashley McBride: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 1.4%Ashley McBride: 0.5%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 9.7%Ashley McBride: 3.1%Berkeleyside: 2.3%Biased Writer Voice9.7%This article: 18.4%Ashley McBride: 1.7%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Indoctrination18.4%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley McBride: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Ashley McBride: 0.2%Berkeleyside: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.8%

642 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech467writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRob Palmer • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRob Palmer • 28 words • 100.0% coverageRob Palmer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 27 words • 0.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 9 words • 0.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 14 words • 0.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 31 words • 0.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 12 words • 100.0% coverageClaudio Bernardino • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Claudio Bernardino

92%flagged-word coverage
115 attributed words66% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination+11.6 ptsWriter: 18.0%Claudio Bernardino: 29.6%29.6%Biased Writer Voice-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Claudio Bernardino: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Claudio Bernardino: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%Claudio Bernardino: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.