Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video642 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High School Diplomas results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,926 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,949 of 16,562 topics). This High School Diplomas is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
High School Diplomas
Topic details
Total words: 1,926
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos