Topic summary
76% 16 analyzed articles/videos 15,754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Economy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 6,694 hits . Analysis detected 58,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,985 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,991 of 15,582 topics). This Global Economy is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Global Economy
Topic details
Total words: 68,985
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles69K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst