Topic summary
32% 11 analyzed articles/videos 11,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Work results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 3,580 hits . Analysis detected 36,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,594 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,263 of 15,448 topics). This Future Of Work is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Future Of Work
Topic details
Total words: 41,594
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score11 analyzed articles41.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst