Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nature magazine results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 3,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,025 of 6,315 authors). This Nature magazine is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Nature magazine
Author details
Total words: 3,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.1% 12.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst