Topic summary
73% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Regulation results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 3,439 hits . Analysis detected 38,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,012 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,608 of 16,266 topics). This Financial Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Financial Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 38,012
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles38K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst