Topic summary
⁠69%5 analyzed articles/videos2,765 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Film Adaptation results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 3,719 hits. Analysis detected 20,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,947 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,781 of 16,562 topics). This Film Adaptation is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Film Adaptation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,947
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos