Topic summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Prosecution results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 4,611 hits . Analysis detected 33,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,526 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (9,278 of 15,534 topics). This Federal Prosecution is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Federal Prosecution
Topic details
Total words: 26,526
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles26.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst