California man facing federal charges in international turtle trafficking plot 15%

By Greg Braxton18%

5/16/2026, 6:01:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.2% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 417 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,039 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the article peer group.

A Daly City man suspected of purchasing and exporting hundreds of poached turtles from Florida is facing federal wildlife trafficking charges, according to Department of Justice officials. 
The agency announced Friday that Donald Do was arrested and charged with submitting false paperwork in an attempt to obtain a permit that would enable him to ship wild and protected turtles to Asia. 
Do’s arrest was part of a joint state and federal crackdown called Operation Southern Hot Herps, which was initiated to detect and deter turtle poachers in the southeastern United States engaged in the Asian pet trade. 
According to the Justice Department, Do and an accomplice tried to export 292 loggerhead musk turtles to Taiwan. 
The co-conspirator obtained an export permit from the U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service based on a false claim by Do that he hatched and raised the turtles, the Justice Department said. 
Loggerhead turtles have large heads and powerful jaws, giving them the ability to feed on hard-shelled prey. 
They’re found around the globe, mostly in subtropical and temperate regions of the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans, and in the Mediterranean Sea, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 
After Do obtained the permit, he purchased the turtles, which had been poached from Florida and other areas, informing sellers that he was interested in “wild caught” turtles, officials said. 
The two men also tried to obtain more than 200 freshwater reptiles from Albert Bazaar of Louisiana, who was detained last week on animal trafficking charges, according to officials. 
In that case, Bazaar was charged with stealing more than 1,800 wild turtles from Florida streams, selling them to a co-conspirator specializing in the Asian pet market for more than $550,000. 
After unsuccessfully exporting the turtles, Do tried to conceal his role by telling his accomplice he had sold them to other domestic buyers, said authorities. 
The plot by Do, officials said, was a violation of the Lacey Act, which bans trafficking in fish, wildlife or plants illegally taken, possessed, transported or sold. 
Do pleaded not guilty at a May 13 court hearing before U.S. 
District Court for the Northern District of California Magistrate Judge Thomas S. 
Hixon. 
He’s next scheduled to appear in federal court in San Francisco at a July 31 status hearing, according to court records. 
If convicted, Do faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each of the conspiracy and Lacey Act charges. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Greg Braxton: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 4.6%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Greg Braxton: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 47.5%Greg Braxton: 5.4%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias47.5%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 71.2%Greg Braxton: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority71.2%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.5%Greg Braxton: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question6.5%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 40.0%Greg Braxton: 4.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote40.0%This article: 7.2%Greg Braxton: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection7.2%This article: 29.0%Greg Braxton: 4.6%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice29.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Braxton: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

417 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers46%attributed speech225writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Justice officials • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Department • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJustice Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • 31 words • 100.0% coverageofficials • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageauthorities • 25 words • 100.0% coverageofficials • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Do • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

officials

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words30% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Quote-first Misdirection+52.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%officials: 52.6%52.6%Unattributed Quote+24.6 ptsWriter: 28.0%officials: 52.6%52.6%Biased Writer Voice+17.6 ptsWriter: 29.8%officials: 47.4%47.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.