Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Crime results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,251 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,484 of 16,562 topics). This Environmental Crime is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Environmental Crime
Topic details
Total words: 1,251
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
9.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.7%23.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos