Keyword summary
38%7 analyzed articles/videos3,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Charges results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,584 hits. Analysis detected 13,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,568 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,673 of 37,456 keywords). This Federal Charges is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Federal Charges
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Federal Charges (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate