Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eliza Billingham results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,945 of 6,629 authors). This Eliza Billingham is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Eliza Billingham
Author details
Total words: 1,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.7% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst