Jury finds 3 Spokane protesters guilty of conspiracy for blocking transfer of ICE detainees 23%

By Doug Nadvornick0% Eliza Billingham0%

5/29/2026, 4:35:50 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 484 faulty-reasoning hits from 445 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,898 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the article peer group.

Three Spokane protesters were convicted of federal conspiracy charges Thursday and now await their sentencing. 
The protestors face up to six years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. 
Jac Archer, Justice Forral and Bajun Mavalwalla II were arrested for trying to prevent federal officers from transporting two detained immigrants from Spokane to Tacoma in June 2025. 
The trio, dubbed the “Spokane 3,” were among hundreds who responded to a Facebook post by former City Council President Ben Stuckart last summer that called for people to join him in blocking the transfer bus. 
Stuckart was a sponsor for one of the two detained immigrants. 
Both were in the United States seeking asylum. 
Nine of the protesters, including Stuckart, were arrested on conspiracy charges. 
Stuckart was among six who took guilty pleas for reduced sentences. 
After a jury handed down the verdict Thursday, Washington State Representative Natasha Hill, D-Spokane, thanked people who supported the defendants through the nearly two-week trial  but called out Stuckart for not showing up. 
“You started this and you couldn’t even show up to finish it,” she said. 
“So I call on you, and I call on others to do what you said you were going to do, and stand up for your community because the fight is not over with this conviction.” 
Stuckart posted on Facebook Thursday night that he was told attending the trial could violate the terms of his parole. 
“I feel awful about the guilty verdict. 
I feel awful for Jac, Bajun and Justice and their families. 
I support those that took plea deals, and I support those that went to trial,” Stuckart wrote. 
Bajun Mavalwalla, Sr., the father of one of the protesters and a congressional candidate, said federal attorneys wanted to make an example of his son. 
He said he believed the federal government is trying to deter people around the country from speaking out against immigration enforcement policy. 
“The right to protest, the right to dissent, the right to assemble—all of those things are now in question because of this case,” he said. 
"In other cases across the country, the juries were not tainted and the cases have been thrown out.” 
Mavalwalla, Sr., said he hopes that will happen in this case as well. 
The Spokesman Review reported that in her closing statement, U.S. 
Attorney Lisa Cartier-Giroux said that the protesters had planned to block federal agents from leaving and that agents felt afraid as the protest grew in size. 
Defense attorneys said they expect to appeal the conviction. 
The Northwest News Network’s Adia White contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Doug Nadvornick: 1.2%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Doug Nadvornick: 2.0%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 4.0%Doug Nadvornick: 1.0%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Doug Nadvornick: 0.7%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 5.6%Doug Nadvornick: 1.4%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.6%This article: 17.5%Doug Nadvornick: 6.3%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias17.5%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Doug Nadvornick: 5.3%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.6%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 1.6%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.6%Doug Nadvornick: 5.6%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope5.6%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Doug Nadvornick: 8.1%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.9%Doug Nadvornick: 12.0%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion20.9%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.9%Doug Nadvornick: 1.2%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.0%Doug Nadvornick: 2.0%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Doug Nadvornick: 0.8%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 7.9%Doug Nadvornick: 2.0%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 7.9%Doug Nadvornick: 9.3%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination7.9%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Doug Nadvornick: 0.0%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

445 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers47%attributed speech237writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageNatasha Hill • 14 words • 100.0% coverageNatasha Hill • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBen Stuckart • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBen Stuckart • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBen Stuckart • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBajun Mavalwalla, Sr. • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBajun Mavalwalla, Sr. • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBajun Mavalwalla, Sr. • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBajun Mavalwalla, Sr. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageThe Spokesman Review • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLisa Cartier-Giroux • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageThe Northwest News Network • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Natasha Hill

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words24% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Quote-first Misdirection+71.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Natasha Hill: 71.4%71.4%Indoctrination+71.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Natasha Hill: 71.4%71.4%Unattributed Quote+28.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Natasha Hill: 28.6%28.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.