Speaker summary
67% 21 analyzed articles/videos 163.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Officials results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 81 hits . Analysis detected 599.413 faulty-reasoning hits from 163.333 analyzed words across 21 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (22,157 of 28,364 speakers). This Officials is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Officials
Speaker details
Total words: 163.333
Content count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 14.7% BS Score21 analyzed videos163.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 25.3% 25.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 30.6% 30.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 26.8% 26.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst