Topic summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos2,579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Law Enforcement results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 935 hits. Analysis detected 7,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,218 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,621 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Law Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Federal Law Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 9,218
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate