Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Budget results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,543 hits. Analysis detected 12,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,416 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,178 of 16,562 topics). This Federal Budget is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Federal Budget
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos