Topic summary
82% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fast Food results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,279 hits . Analysis detected 13,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,665 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (7,815 of 15,689 topics). This Fast Food is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Fast Food
Topic details
Total words: 10,665
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst