Topic summary
19% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farming results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,997 hits . Analysis detected 13,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,205 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,422 of 15,447 topics). This Farming is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Farming
Topic details
Total words: 21,205
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst