Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hope Edmond results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 162 hits . Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,228 authors). This Hope Edmond is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Hope Edmond
Author details
Total words: 1,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst