Topic summary
⁠84%4 analyzed articles/videos5,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Far Right Movements results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 4,404 hits. Analysis detected 30,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,699 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,719 of 16,562 topics). This Far Right Movements is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Far Right Movements

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos