Topic summary
20% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Facial Recognition results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 3,057 hits . Analysis detected 19,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,957 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,124 of 16,562 topics). This Facial Recognition is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Facial Recognition
Topic details
Total words: 25,957
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles26K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst