Author summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dell Cameron results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 4,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,472 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,049 of 6,362 authors). This Dell Cameron is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Dell Cameron
Author details
Total words: 5,472
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst