Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lily Hay Newman results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 1,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,503 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,575 of 6,316 authors). This Lily Hay Newman is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Lily Hay Newman
Author details
Total words: 1,503
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Middle Ground: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst