Topic summary
54% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Facebook results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 2,335 hits . Analysis detected 18,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,977 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,797 of 16,343 topics). This Facebook is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Facebook
Topic details
Total words: 16,977
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles17K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst