Author summary
2% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Holly Ramer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Status Quo Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,503 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,436 of 6,498 authors). This Holly Ramer is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Holly Ramer
Author details
Total words: 4,503
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst