Topic summary
68%18 analyzed articles/videos14,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Power results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 13,906 hits. Analysis detected 87,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,408 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,023 of 15,447 topics). This Executive Power is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score18 analyzed articles69.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Trump Imposes New Illegal Tariffs on Canada75%
Reason.com38%By Ilya Somin91%7/21/2026, 1:03:08 AM
The Trump Admin’s Global Campaign Against ‘Radical Left Terrorism’ Is Built on a National Security Memo Without Congressional Approval64%
Talking Points Memo89%By Melinda Haas88%7/20/2026, 7:00:00 PM
After the Supreme Court killed his first tariffs, Trump turns to a new legal workaround to impose 25% tariffs on Brazil and possibly others53%
Fortune52%By Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez54%7/17/2026, 9:28:52 PM
ICE Is Trump’s Standing Army Now59%
Persuasion37%By Luke Hallam76%7/16/2026, 12:15:32 AM
Intel Pick Jay Clayton Won’t Tell Congress Whether Trump Ordered Subpoenas of NYT Journalists39%
The Intercept81%By Matt Sledge62%7/15/2026, 5:47:38 PM
The 2026 Supreme Court -- a ‘C Minus’ at Best77%
American Thinker93%By Don Brown0%7/8/2026, 12:00:00 AM
The Roberts Court and the Disappearing Congress46%
Washington Monthly51%By Peter M. Shane0%7/1/2026, 1:39:56 AM
Trump’s quest for untrammeled power just got a big boost55%
Vox49%By Zack Beauchamp53%6/30/2026, 8:05:00 PM
How the Supreme Court opened the door for Trump to fire independent officials72%
MS NOW94%By Ray Brescia0%6/30/2026, 6:56:58 PM
The Supreme Court Has Weakened The Regulatory State67%
American Thinker93%By S. David Sultzer0%6/30/2026, 12:00:00 AM