Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter M. Shane results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,464 hits . Analysis detected 10,153 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of â 56% (2,843 of 6,357 authors). This Peter M. Shane is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Peter M. Shane
Author details
Total words: 8,792
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.0% 28.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst