Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency-Preparedness results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 2,135 hits . Analysis detected 6,413 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,858 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,089 of 15,325 topics). This Emergency-Preparedness is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Emergency-Preparedness
Topic details
Total words: 6,858
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 31.1% 31.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.3% Composition/Division: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst