Topic summary
56% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Management results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,846 hits . Analysis detected 15,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,698 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,900 of 15,707 topics). This Emergency Management is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Emergency Management
Topic details
Total words: 18,698
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTBB 44% 7/21/2026, 3:15:00 AM