Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Ballard results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 5,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,746 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,015 of 6,235 authors). This Caroline Ballard is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Caroline Ballard
Author details
Total words: 5,746
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst