KUER0%

Salt Lake City’s 1st Free Blockbuster is a fun antidote to streaming sticker shock90%

By Caroline Ballard0%

12/23/2025, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 955 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,297 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the article peer group.

Kate Kowalczik has fond childhood memories of hunting for the perfect weekend movie rental. 
“I grew up in Kaysville, and we had this local spot, Cosmos Video,” she said. 
“And every Friday night I would go with my dad, and they had some special where you could get, like, five movies for a certain price. 
And I'd always, you know, run up and down the aisles excited to pick mine that I was going to take home for the weekend.” 
Now, she’s got a little piece of that childhood feeling in her front yard. 
Kowalczik is the owner of Salt Lake City’s first Little Free Blockbuster, located in The Avenues neighborhood. 
It’s like a Little Free Library but for movies and music, as if someone shrunk an old Blockbuster Video store down to the size of a newspaper box. 
She fell in love with the idea when she came across it on social media. 
Kowalczik is a social worker and saw the box as a way she could give back. 
“I see a lot of folks who don't have a lot of resources, don't have a lot of community, and so in my personal life, participating in things that help build that community is really important to me,” she said. 
The whole project came together in about a weekend. 
Right now, it’s stocked with seasonal favorites like “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” and “Elf.” 
There are hundreds of Little Free Blockbusters nationwide, but only two in Utah. 
Recapturing the feeling of a Friday night video store run is only part of the appeal. 
It’s also a nostalgic way for Utahns to save some cash. 
The monthly streaming bill for one household with premium subscriptions to Netflix, Peacock, Hulu, HBO Max and Apple TV could come close to $100. 
Between price hikes and password-sharing crackdowns from streaming services, some customers are reconsidering how much they’re willing to spend on entertainment subscriptions. 
A report released this summer on consumer habits and streaming from the Bank of America Institute found a lot of so-called “churn.” 
“In other words, it looks like, from their monthly payments, that people are cutting services, but they're also adding services,” said David Tinsley, a senior economist with the institute. 
“So I think there's quite a lot of competition in the market in terms of shopping around.” 
He said nationwide, consumers are squeezed. 
“So their wage growth, particularly at the lower income end, has slipped. 
Their overall spending growth has slipped. 
They're still under pressure from things like higher motor insurance, higher housing costs, higher child care costs. 
So in a way, streaming is one of the areas they can look at and take a fresh look at,” he said. 
After Park City resident Reid Barnes lost her husband, she picked up several streaming services for entertainment. 
But over the last couple of years, she said she “just kind of slowly dropped things.” 
It freed up more time for other hobbies. 
“I read a lot more,” she said. 
“I teach cross country skiing for the city, and go out and play with my  I'm retired  so go out and play with my friends. 
I love to hike. 
Take the dogs hiking, and I sew. 
I just finished a t-shirt quilt for a friend who lost her mom. 
And I make costumes for my grandchildren, and, you know, clothes for myself.” 
And Cottonwood Heights resident Jonathan Deesing said he couldn’t justify it anymore when the price of Netflix neared $20 a month. 
And he didn’t stop there. 
He whittled down other streaming services, too. 
He said he now shares one streaming bundle with a friend, each of them paying around $10 a month. 
But the cost savings didn’t land back in his entertainment budget. 
“It went to inflation. 
It went to the grocery store. 
I don't think it was really discretionary funding. 
It just went right back into the bills category,” he said. 
Deesing also relies on his own movie collection and on the Salt Lake County Library system. 
Libraries still have huge selections of DVDs and music, and even get new releases. 
Those options are free to borrow with a library card. 
“And you can just reserve it, and they'll ship it to your library, and then you just get a text when it's ready, and it feels like old Netflix,” Deesing said. 
“It’s awesome.” 
For Kate Kowalczik and her Little Free Blockbuster, it’s really about community. 
The bright blue box is definitely a conversation starter, and she’s even watched a young preschooler discover what DVDs were in this age of streaming. 
“I think joy is contagious, and so it's been so fun and joyful for me to just witness, even when people don't take something from the box, to see that smile has just, it's brought a lot of joy into my life.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.5%Caroline Ballard: 3.5%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias14.5%This article: 4.8%Caroline Ballard: 4.8%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Caroline Ballard: 3.2%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.6%Caroline Ballard: 9.0%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect22.6%This article: 2.6%Caroline Ballard: 1.3%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error2.6%This article: 2.0%Caroline Ballard: 6.3%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 4.8%Caroline Ballard: 2.2%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 1.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.7%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Caroline Ballard: 4.0%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion5.3%This article: 7.1%Caroline Ballard: 7.9%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias7.1%This article: 11.4%Caroline Ballard: 4.4%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Caroline Ballard: 3.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias3.2%This article: 2.1%Caroline Ballard: 2.9%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.5%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 2.6%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.4%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.2%Caroline Ballard: 3.3%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias11.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 1.7%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.6%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 1.2%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 3.3%Caroline Ballard: 3.1%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 16.2%Caroline Ballard: 6.2%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority16.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 5.1%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 1.2%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.8%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.8%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 2.9%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.6%Caroline Ballard: 4.3%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Ballard: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

807 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.